Obama and the Cloward-Piven Strategy

American Thinker details Barack Obama’s links to the radical left, introduces the names of Columbia University professors Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, and details a decades long strategy of deliberate failure.

This may be the most important post I will read this year (via Ace); it should ring an alarm bell with Canadians. We too have seen our country changed beyond recognition in the service of the same ideology and by variations on the same policy of deliberate failure and the will to decline.

Citing David Horowitz, American Thinker defines the Cloward-Piven strategy:

The strategy of forcing political change through orchestrated crisis. The “Cloward-Piven Strategy” seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse.

By crisis, we mean a publicly visible disruption in some institutional sphere. Crisis can occur spontaneously (e.g., riots) or as the intended result of tactics of demonstration and protest which either generate institutional disruption or bring unrecognized disruption to public attention.

Continuing:

No matter where the strategy is implemented, it shares the following features:

1. The offensive organizes previously unorganized groups eligible for government benefits but not currently receiving all they can.
2. The offensive seeks to identify new beneficiaries and/or create new benefits.
3. The overarching aim is always to impose new stresses on target systems, with the ultimate goal of forcing their collapse.

Deliberate, crippling immigration policy, systemic fraudulent voter registration (such that eight of the nineteen 9/11 hijackers were registered to vote), multi-generational welfare dependency and the culture of entitlement it both stems from and creates and, of course, using the taxpayer to guarantee home purchasing for people who could not afford to purchase houses and here we are today.

I ask you, is it possible ACORN would train Obama to take leadership positions within ACORN without telling him what he was training for? Is it possible ACORN would put Obama in leadership positions without clueing him into what his purpose was?? Is it possible that this most radical of organizations would put someone in charge of training its trainers, without him knowing what it was he was training them for?

As a community activist for ACORN; as a leadership trainer for ACORN; as a lead organizer for ACORN’s Project Vote; as an attorney representing ACORN’s successful efforts to impose Motor Voter regulations in Illinois; as ACORN’s representative in lobbying for the expansion of high risk housing loans through Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that led to the current crisis; as a recipient of their assistance in his political campaigns — both with money and campaign workers; it is doubtful that he was unaware of ACORN’s true goals. It is doubtful he was unaware of the Cloward-Piven Strategy.

We are on the verge of the election to the presidency of the man Americans should hold most accountable for instigating the next Great Depression but who unaccountably Americans may have decided is the man to save them from it. Forward this American Thinker piece to everybody.

Barack Obama and the Strategy of Manufactured Crisis

4 Comments so far »

  1. Arlen Williams said

    am October 4 2008 @ 2:04 am

    Flood emails, forums, and blogs with:

    CLOWARD-PIVEN STRATEGY

  2. Arlen said

    am October 6 2008 @ 3:15 pm

    Please get out the word, to and through major figures in conservative media.

    Send this information to the McCain-Palin campaign.

  3. Juliette said

    am October 21 2008 @ 8:28 pm

    I think this ridiculous post should have stayed in your pocket, with the rest of your universe.

  4. Joe said

    am October 21 2008 @ 9:55 pm

    1. The offensive organizes previously unorganized groups eligible for government benefits but not currently receiving all they can. - Like military contractors?

    2. The offensive seeks to identify new beneficiaries and/or create new benefits. - Like religious organizations seeking federal money?

    3. The overarching aim is always to impose new stresses on target systems, with the ultimate goal of forcing their collapse. - Like the federal bureaucracy?

    I’d say it’s more likely that Cheney’s been using this than that Obama is intending to.

Comment RSS

Leave a comment

Name:

eMail:

Website:

Comment: